CO2BRA
Home About

NETL


This database and toolset were created within the Research and Innovation Center at the Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). This work was conducted as part ongoing work to characterize relative permeability of carbon dioxide (CO2) and in-situ brine within both conventional and unconventional reservoir types for the purposes of CO2 sequestration and enhanced oil recovery. The database is an attempt to broadly characterize multiple depositional environments, per the NETL carbon storage atlas (reference), for the purposes of identifying target reservoirs for exploitation and providing freely accessible data that is otherwise computationally and financially prohibitive to obtain.

NETL

Methodology


Methodology Infographic

Experimental setup description: core held in core holder with confining pressure?, flooded with brine solution, supercritical CO2 injected. During injection pressure at inlet and outlet of core is measured. Injection measured in terms of pore volumes injected. During injection CT images captured with Toshiba AquilionTM RXL medical CT scanner.

Click Here for a detailed explanation of the data and methodology for calculating relative permeabilities.

Attribution


Please cite this data as: Dustin Crandall, Johnathan Moore, Sarah Brown, Seth King, NETL-CO2BRA Relative Permeability Database, https://edx.netl.doe.gov/edxapps/co2bra (NETL, Morgantown, WV, 2019).

Export Bibtex

Related Publications


Read about our Geoimaging capabilities here.

Our digital core repository can be found here: https://edx.netl.doe.gov/group/core-characterization

References


J. Toth, T. Bodi, P. Szucs, F. Civan, Practical method for analysis of immiscible displacement in laboratory core tests. Transport in Porous Media. 31, 347–363 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006570117639

J. Toth, T. Bodi, P. Szucs, F. Civan, Convenient formulae for determination of relative permeability from unsteady-state fluid displacements in core plugs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 36, 33-44 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(02)00249-8