Discover

Unlocking data-driven capabilities for the entire transport and storage community

Bibliographies

Filter by Categories

Monitoring Carbon Storage Sites With Time-Lapse Gravity Surveys. Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage

Appriou, D.; Bonneville, A. (2022). Monitoring Carbon Storage Sites With Time-Lapse Gravity Surveys. Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage, Huang, L. (Ed.), 2022, 211-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119156871.ch14.

Fundamentals of Electrical and Electromagnetic Techniques for CO2 Monitoring

Gasperikova, E.; Morrison, H. F. Fundamentals of Electrical and Electromagnetic Techniques for CO2 Monitoring. Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage, Huang, L. (Ed.), 2022, 233-253. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119156871.ch15.

Automatic Waveform Quality Control for Surface Waves Using Machine Learning

Chai, C., Kintner, J.A., Cleveland, K.M., Luo, J., Maceira, M., and Charles J. Ammon, C.J., “Automatic Waveform Quality Control for Surface Waves Using Machine Learning,” Seismological Research Letters, 93(3), 1683-1694, (2022) https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210302.

NRAP-Open-IAM: Generic Aquifer Component Development and Testing

Bacon, D. H. NRAP-Open-IAM: Generic Aquifer Component Development and Testing. PNNL-32590, 2022, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA. https://doi.org/10.2172/1845855.

Machine Learning Enhanced Seismic Monitoring at 100 km and 10 m Scales

Chai, C., Maceira, M., and EGS Collab Team, “Machine Learning Enhanced Seismic Monitoring at 100 km and 10 m Scales,” in Proceedings, 47th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, edited, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 47, 635–645, (2022) https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1845768.

Sensitivity of geophysical techniques for monitoring secondary CO2 storage plumes

Gasperikova, E.; Appriou, D.; Bonneville, A.; Feng, Z.; Huang, L.; Gao, K.; Yang, X.; Daley, T. Sensitivity of geophysical techniques for monitoring secondary CO2 storage plumes. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2022, 114, Article 103585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103585.

Scaling Behavior of Thermally Driven Fractures in Deep Low-Permeability Formations: A Plane Strain Model with 1-D Heat Conduction

Chen, B.; Zhou, Q. Scaling Behavior of Thermally Driven Fractures in Deep Low-Permeability Formations: A Plane Strain Model with 1-D Heat Conduction. Journal of Geophysical Research – Solid Earth 2022, Research Article. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022964.

Distilling Data to Drive Carbon Storage Insights

Morkner, P.; Bauer, J.; Creason, C.; Sabbatino, M.; Wingo, P.; Greenburg, R.; Walker, S.; Yeates, D.; Rose, K. Distilling Data to Drive Carbon Storage Insights. Computers & Geosciences 2022, 158, Article 104945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104945.

Deep Learning Inversion of Gravity Data for Detection of CO2 Plumes in Overlying Aquifers

Yang, X.; Chen, X.; Smith, M.M. Deep Learning Inversion of Gravity Data for Detection of CO2 Plumes in Overlying Aquifers. Journal of Applied Geophysics 2022, 196(104507). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104507.

A Review of Well Integrity Based on Field Experience at Carbon Utilization and Storage Sites

Iyer, J.; Lackey, G.; Edvardsen, L.; Bean, A.; Carroll, S.A.; Huerta, N.; Smith, M.M.; Torsaeter, M.; Dilmore, R.M.; Cerasi, P. A Review of Well Integrity Based on Field Experience at Carbon Utilization and Storage Sites. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2022, 113(103533). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103533

A Quantitative Risk Assessment Approach for Developing Contingency Plans at a Geologic Carbon Storage Site

Mitchell, N.; Lackey, G.; Schwartz, B.; Strazisar, B.; Dilmore, R. A Quantitative Risk Assessment Approach for Developing Contingency Plans at a Geologic Carbon Storage Site. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 2023, 13(3), 320-339. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2219.

Evaluating Probability of Containment Effectiveness at a GCS Site using Integrated Assessment Modeling Approach with Bayesian Decision Network

Wang, Z.; Dilmore, R. M.; Bacon, D. H.; Harbert, W. Evaluating Probability of Containment Effectiveness at a GCS Site using Integrated Assessment Modeling Approach with Bayesian Decision Network, Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2021, 11(2), 360-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2056.

Modeling‐Based Assessment of Deep Seismic Potential Induced by Geologic Carbon Storage

Chang, K.W., and Yoon, H., “Modeling‐Based Assessment of Deep Seismic Potential Induced by Geologic Carbon Storage,” Seismological Research Letters, 49(3), 1447–1454, (2023) https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220365.

Joint Physics-Based and Data-Driven Time-Lapse Seismic Inversion: Mitigating Data Scarcity

Liu, Y., Feng, S., Tsvankin, I., Alumbaugh, D., and Lin, Y., “Joint Physics-Based and Data-Driven Time-Lapse Seismic Inversion: Mitigating Data Scarcity,” Geophysics, (2022) doi.org/10.1190/geo2022-0050.1.

NRAP Recommended Practices for Containment Assurance and Leakage Risk Quantification

Thomas, R. B.; Schwartz, B.; Oldenburg, C.; Bacon, D. H.; Gasperikova, E.; Lackey. G.; Appriou, D.; Harp, D.; Chen, B.; Doughty, C.; Burghardt, J.; Pawar, R. J.; Brown, C. F.; Smith, M. M.; Van Voorhees, R.; Strazisar, B. R.; Dilmore, R. M. NRAP Recommended Practices for Containment Assurance and Leakage Risk Quantification; NRAP-TRS-I-002-2022; DOE.NETL-2022.3344; NETL Technical Report Series; U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory: Pittsburgh, PA, 2022; p 76. DOI: 10.2172/1906399 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1906399/

Computational Tools and Workflows for Quantitative Risk Assessment and Decision Support for Geologic Carbon Storage Sites: Progress and Insights from the U.S. DOE’s National Risk Assessment Partnership

Dilmore, R. M.; Appriou, D.; Bacon, D.; Brown, C.; Cihan, A.; Gasperikova, E.; Kroll, K.; Oldenburg, C. M.; Pawar, R. J.; Smith, M. M.; Strazisar, B. R.; Templeton, D.; Thomas, R. B.; Vasylkivska, V. S.; White, J. A. Computational Tools and Workflows for Quantitative Risk Assessment and Decision Support for Geologic Carbon Storage Sites: Progress and Insights from the U.S. DOE’s National Risk Assessment Partnership. 16th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-16, 23-24th October 2022, Lyon, France. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4298480

Extended Abstract to: Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Assessment Methods for Carbon Storage: A Case Study for the Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Facility

Brown, C. F.; Lackey, G.; Schwartz, B.; Deane, M.; Dilmore, R.; Blanke, H.; O’Brien, S.; Rowe, C. O’Brien, S.; Rowe, C. Extended Abstract to: Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Assessment Methods for Carbon Storage: A Case Study for the Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Facility. 16th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-16, 23-24th October 2022, Lyon, France. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4297575

High-Quality Fracture Network Mapping Using High Frequency Logging While Drilling (LWD) Data: MSEEL Case Study

Fathi, E., Carr, T.R., Adenan, M.F., Panetta, B., Kumar, A., and Carney, B.J., ”High-Quality Fracture Network Mapping Using High Frequency Logging While Drilling (LWD) Data: MSEEL Case Study,” Machine Learning with Applications, Vol. 10 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2022.100421.

Reduced Order Modeling for Flow and Transport Problems with Barlow Twins Self-Supervised Learning

Kadeethum, T., Ballarin, F., O’Malley, D., Choi, Y., Bouklas, N., and Yoon, H., “Reduced Order Modeling for Flow and Transport Problems with Barlow Twins Self-Supervised Learning,” Scientific Reports, 12, Article 20654 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24545-3.

Regulatory Considerations for Geologic Storage of Carbonated Brine Streams. 16th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies

Van Voorhees, R.; Thomas, R. B.; Schwartz, B.; Dilmore, R.; Hamling, J.; Klapperich, R.; Taunton, M. Regulatory Considerations for Geologic Storage of Carbonated Brine Streams. 16th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-16, 23-24th October 2022, Lyon, France. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4285028

Probabilistic Machine Learning for Integrated Social-Natural-Physical Assessment

Ghanem, R., Zhang, R., Rose, K., invited talk, Probabilistic Machine Learning for Integrated Social-Natural-Physical Assessment, AGU Annual Meeting 2020, Session: H027 – Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multiscale Model-Experimental Integration https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm20/prelim.cgi/Session/103051

Deep Learning to Locate Seafloor Landslides in High Resolution Bathymetry

Dyer, A., Zaengle, D., Mark-Moser, M., Duran, R., Suhag, A., Rose, K., Bauer, J. Deep Learning to Locate Seafloor Landslides in High Resolution Bathymetry. AGU Annual Fall Meeting (Virtual), 2020. Session: NH007 – Data Science and Machine Learning for Natural Hazard Sciences II Posters. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1779617

A Geospatial Analytical Framework to Identify Seafloor Geohazards in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

Duran, R., Dyer, A., Mark-Moser, M., Bauer, J., Rose, K., Zaengle. D., Wingo, P. 2020. A Geospatial Analytical Framework to Identify Seafloor Geohazards in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. AGU Annual Meeting 2020, Session: NH010 – Geohazards in Marine and Lacustrine Environments. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AGUFMNH004..08D/abstract

Optimizing Prediction of Reservoir Properties with Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, and the Subsurface Trend Analysis Method

Mark-Moser, M., Suhag, A., Rose, K., Wingo, P.  (2020, November 9). Optimizing prediction of reservoir properties with artificial intelligence, big data, and the Subsurface Trend Analysis method [Conference presentation]. Machine Learning for Oil and Gas 2020, Nov. 9-11, Virtual. https://edx.netl.doe.gov/sites/offshore/optimizing-prediction-of-reservoir-properties-with-artificial-intelligence-big-data-and-the-subsurface-trend-analysis-method/

Advanced Geospatial Analytics and Machine Learning for Offshore and Onshore Oil & Natural Gas Infrastructure

Justman D., Romeo, L., Barkhurst, A., Bauer, J., Duran, R., Dyer, A., Nelson, J., Sabbatino, M., Wingo, P., Wenzlick, M., Zaengle, D., Rose, K. (2020, October 6-7).  Advanced geospatial analytics and machine learning for offshore and onshore oil & natural gas infrastructure. [Virtual conference presentation]. GIS Week 2020. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1767074

Enhancing Knowledge Discovery of Unstructured Data to Support Context in Subsurface-Modeling Predictions

Hoover, B., Mark-Moser, M., Wingo, P., Suhag, A., Rose, K. 2021. Enhancing knowledge discovery of unstructured data to support context in subsurface-modeling predictions. ACE/SEG21, Denver, Colorado, Sept. 26th-Oct. 1st. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1843422

Using AI/ML to Curate Thousands of Carbon Storage Data Assets via EDX

Morkner, P., Rowan, C., Rose, K., Bauer, J., Sabbatino, M., Barhurst, A. Using AI/ML to Curate Thousands of Carbon Storage Data Assets via EDX. NETL Carbon Storage Review Meeting. September 10, 2020. Virtual. https://netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/netl-file/20CSVPR_Morkner.pdf

Assessing Offshore CO2 Saline Storage Potential with the NETL Calculator

Romeo, L., Rose, K., Thomas, R., Mark-Moser, M., Barkhurst, A., Wingo, P., Bean, A. 2020. Assessing Offshore CO2 Saline Storage Potential with the NETL Calculator. Carbon Storage Review Meeting. September 11, 2020. Virtual. https://netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/netl-file/20CSVPR_Romeo_11.pdf

Building an Analytical Framework to Measure Offshore Infrastructure Integrity, Identify Risk, and Strategize Future Use for Oil and Gas

Dyer, A., Romeo, L., Wenzlick, M., Bauer, J., Nelson, J., Duran, R., Zaengle, D., Wingo, P., and Sabbatino, M. 2020. Building an Analytical Framework to Measure Offshore Infrastructure Integrity, Identify Risk, and Strategize Future Use for Oil and Gas. Esri User Conference, San Diego, CA, July 13-15, 2020. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1604638

Harnessing the Power of DOE Data Computing for End-user Analytics, SMART Webinar

Rose, K., Barkhurst, A., Mark-Moser, M., Romeo, L., and Wingo, P., 2020, Harnessing the Power of DOE Data Computing for End-user Analytics, SMART Webinar 6/25/2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5oUWSb-kHc&feature=youtu.be

Scroll to Top