Bauer, J. R., and Rose, K., 2015, Variable Grid Method: an Intuitive Approach for Simultaneously Quantifying and Visualizing Spatial Data and Uncertainty, Transactions in GIS. 19(3), p. 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12158
Discover
Unlocking data-driven capabilities for the entire transport and storage community
Bibliographies
Variable Grid Method: An Intuitive Approach for Simultaneously Quantifying and Visualizing Spatial Data and Uncertainty
Rules and Tools Crosswalk: A Compendium of Computational Tools to Support Geologic Carbon Storage Environmentally Protective UIC Class VI Permitting
Lackey, G.; Strazisar, B. R.; Kobelski, B.; McEvoy, M.; Bacon, D. H.; Cihan, A.; Iyer, J.; Livers-Douglas, A.; Pawar, R.; Sminchak, J.; Wernette, B.; Dilmore, R. M. Rules and Tools Crosswalk: A Compendium of Computational Tools to Support Geologic Carbon Storage Environmentally Protective UIC Class VI Permitting; NRAP-TRS-I-001-2022; DOE.NETL-2022.3731; NETL Technical Report Series; U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory: Pittsburgh, PA, 2022; p 120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/1870412
Applied machine learning model comparison: Predicting offshore platform integrity with gradient boosting algorithms and neural networks
Dyer, A.S., Zaengle, D., Nelson, J.R., Duran, R., Wenzlick, M., Wingo, P.C., Bauer, J.R., Rose, K., and Romeo, L. (2022). Applied machine learning model comparison: Predicting offshore platform integrity with gradient boosting algorithms and neural networks, Marine Structures, Volume 83, 103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103152.
Bayesian Approach for In-Situ Stress Prediction and Uncertainty Quantification for Subsurface Engineering
Bao, T.; Burghardt, J. A. Bayesian Approach for In-Situ Stress Prediction and Uncertainty Quantification for Subsurface Engineering. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 2022, 55, 4531–4548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02857-0.
Thermal and solubility effects on fault leakage during geologic carbon storage
Meguerdijian, S.; Pawar, R. J.; Harp, D. R.; Jha, B. Thermal and solubility effects on fault leakage during geologic carbon storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2022, 116, Article 103633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103633.
Leakage from Coexisting Geologic Forcing and Injection-Induced Pressurization: A Semi-Analytical Solution for Multilayered Aquifers with Multiple Wells
Cihan, A.; Oldenburg, C. M.; Birkholzer, J. T. Leakage from Coexisting Geologic Forcing and Injection-Induced Pressurization: A Semi-Analytical Solution for Multilayered Aquifers with Multiple Wells. Water Resources Research 2022, 58 (5), e2022WR032343. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032343.
Coupled hydromechanical modeling of induced seismicity from CO2 injection in the Illinois Basin
Luu, K.; Schoenball, M.; Oldenburg, C. M.; Rutqvist, J. Coupled hydromechanical modeling of induced seismicity from CO2 injection in the Illinois Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 2022, 127(5), e2021JB023496. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023496.
Monitoring Geologic Carbon Sequestration Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography
Yang, X.; Carrigan, C. Monitoring Geologic Carbon Sequestration Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage, Huang, L. (Ed.), 2022, 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119156871.ch16.
Monitoring Carbon Storage Sites With Time-Lapse Gravity Surveys. Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage
Appriou, D.; Bonneville, A. (2022). Monitoring Carbon Storage Sites With Time-Lapse Gravity Surveys. Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage, Huang, L. (Ed.), 2022, 211-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119156871.ch14.
Fundamentals of Electrical and Electromagnetic Techniques for CO2 Monitoring
Gasperikova, E.; Morrison, H. F. Fundamentals of Electrical and Electromagnetic Techniques for CO2 Monitoring. Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage, Huang, L. (Ed.), 2022, 233-253. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119156871.ch15.
Automatic Waveform Quality Control for Surface Waves Using Machine Learning
Chai, C., Kintner, J.A., Cleveland, K.M., Luo, J., Maceira, M., and Charles J. Ammon, C.J., “Automatic Waveform Quality Control for Surface Waves Using Machine Learning,” Seismological Research Letters, 93(3), 1683-1694, (2022) https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210302.
CO2-Locate (v2): A Living National Well Database
Romeo, L., Bauer, J., Pfander, I., Cleaveland, C., Dyer, A., Sabbatino, M., Tetteh, D., and K. Rose. CO2-Locate (v2): A Living National Well Database. 2024 FECM / NETL Carbon Management Research Project Review Meeting. Pittsburgh, PA. August 5–9, 2024.
EDX disCO2ver, Increasing Carbon Transport & Storage Product Awareness and Understanding Through Stakeholder Engagement
Rose, K., 2024, “EDX disCO2ver, Increasing Carbon Transport & Storage Product Awareness and Understanding Through Stakeholder Engagement”, FECM / NETL Carbon Management Research Project Review Meeting. Pittsburgh, PA. August 5-9, 2024.
Developing the Carbon Storage Site Mapping Inquiry Tool (MapIT)
Schooley, C., Pantaleone, S., Shay, J., Strazisar, B., and Morkner, P. “Developing the Carbon Storage Site Mapping Inquiry Tool (MapIT)”. FECM/NETL Carbon Management Meeting. Pittsburgh, PA. August 5-9, 2024.
Dynamic CCS-Energy Community Database and Web Application – What’s New
Sharma, M., Bocan, J., White, C., Malay, C., Cleaveland, C., Rose, K., and Bauer, J., “Dynamic CCS-Energy Community Database and Web Application – What’s New,” FECM/NETL Carbon Management Research Project Review Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, August 5–9, 2024.
Community Sentiment Analysis with focus on CCS
White, C., Sharma, M., Rose, K., and Bauer, J. “Community Sentiment Analysis with focus on CCS”. 2024 FECM / NETL Carbon Management Research Project Review Meeting. Pittsburgh, PA. August 4-9, 2024.
Deploying a Publicly Available and Living National Oil and Gas Well Geodatabase
Pfander, I., Romeo, L., Amrine, D., Sabbatino, M., Sharma, M., Tetteh, D., and Bauer, J., “Deploying a Publicly Available and Living National Oil and Gas Well Geodatabase,” 2024 Esri User Conference, San Diego, CA, July 15–19, 2024.
A Geodatabase Designed to Inform and Support Safe CO2 Transport-Route Planning
Schooley, C., Romeo, L., Pfander, I., Justman, D., Sharma, M., Bauer, J., and Rose, K.,“A Geodatabase Designed to Inform and Support Safe CO2 Transport-Route Planning,” 2024 Esri User Conference, San Diego, CA. July 15–19, 2024. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/2403249
A Dashboard to Support Community Transitions for Carbon Capture and Storage
Sharma, M., White, C., Cleaveland, C., Amrine, D., Rose, K., and Bauer, J., “A Dashboard to Support Community Transitions for Carbon Capture and Storage,” 2024 Esri User Conference, San Diego, CA, July 15–19, 2024. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/2404263
Where are the Data? Automating a Workflow for Carbon Storage Data Gap Analysis
Creason, C.G., Mulhern, J.S., Cordero Rodriguez, N., Mark-Moser, M., Lara, A., Shay, J., and Rose, K., “Where are the Data? Automating a Workflow for Carbon Storage Data Gap Analysis,” FECM/NETL Carbon Management Research Project Review Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, August 5–9, 2024. https://netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/netl-file/24CM/24CM_CTS3_5_Creason.pdf
Energy Community Dynamic Database for CCS Systems
Sharma, M., White, C., Bocan, J., Cleaveland, C., Malay, C., Bauer, J., and Rose, K., “Energy Community Dynamic Database for CCS Systems,” GES Tech Talk, Morgantown, WV, June 2024.